🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.